WinErr 100038 — Unable to read/copy file — When folder was read-only
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2026 9:36 am
A cautionary/GOTCHA tale: Unexpected "Read-error" (really a write-error?) due to a parent folder being Read-only
Worked-around, by setting Read&Write, but is there a better way?
A sync from a source drive to a target drive failed for all the files within a certain parent folder.
The reported error was Read error `WinErr 10038`
The issue turned out to be that (only) the parent folder had read-only permission.
Syncovery succeeded in copying that folder across, as an item it its own right
The result of that folder-only copy-operation was an empty folder with read-only permission.
Consequently, subsequent attempts (by Syncovery or any other means, e.g. file-dragging) to put any files in that folder were refused (by the OS).
My quick-fix workaround was to change the source folder to `Read & Write`.
Ideally, I'd have preferred Syncovery to have treated such situations as a special case, such that when a read-only folder was encountered, it and its contents were together added to the target via a single "atomic" operation (e.g. via a temporary image-file).
Is a better fix/workaround possible? Any advice welcome.
Worked-around, by setting Read&Write, but is there a better way?
A sync from a source drive to a target drive failed for all the files within a certain parent folder.
The reported error was Read error `WinErr 10038`
The issue turned out to be that (only) the parent folder had read-only permission.
Syncovery succeeded in copying that folder across, as an item it its own right
The result of that folder-only copy-operation was an empty folder with read-only permission.
Consequently, subsequent attempts (by Syncovery or any other means, e.g. file-dragging) to put any files in that folder were refused (by the OS).
My quick-fix workaround was to change the source folder to `Read & Write`.
Ideally, I'd have preferred Syncovery to have treated such situations as a special case, such that when a read-only folder was encountered, it and its contents were together added to the target via a single "atomic" operation (e.g. via a temporary image-file).
Is a better fix/workaround possible? Any advice welcome.